Bandits No More

March 31, 2009

Stuck

Filed under: Evangelism,Local church,Spirituality — rheyduck @ 8:16 pm

Sometimes we get stuck. While getting stuck is commonly taken to be a bad thing, it depends on where we’re stuck or what we’re stuck in.

Perhaps you’re stuck in a family that keeps on loving you even when you act unlovable. You try to pull away, try to go your own way, but wherever you go, you end up back with the people that love you unconditionally. You’re stuck.

Maybe you’re stuck with Jesus. Like the disciples in John 6 you’ve seen Jesus do some wacky things – things that make no sense to you at all. Other folks fall by the wayside. You think of going away yourself. But you say to yourself, “Who else has the words of life?” And you stay with Jesus. You’re stuck.

Sometimes being stuck isn’t so good. Years ago at one of my previous churches I stopped by to visit a family. The man of the house was home alone so I visited with him. His wife was the church attender in the family so I usually only saw him at his house. I’d visted with him a few times before, but this time in the midst of our conversation he blurted out, “I’m not a believer. Everyone thinks I’m a Christian, but I’m not.”

At that point I’d been pastoring that church for a while. I’d never seen him at church. When I consider what the bible says and what I find in the Christian tradition, it seems normal for believers to spend time with other believers. A primary way that happens in our culture is by doing what we call “going to church.” Since I had never seen this fellow do what I thought was a normal activity for believers, I was not shocked by his admission.

In small town Texas our culture has a veneer of Christianity. Except for those real sinful folks, we assume everyone is at least sort of a Christian – especially if they’re from a church family. Some of them will even tell you, “I’m a Baptist.” “I’m a Catholic.” “I’m a Methodist.” We assume: Nice person, faithful to his family, hard worker, good citizen – must be a believer. But he’s not. And he finally built up his courage to tell someone. He’d never told his wife. He’d never told his kids. Never told a soul.

You know what? He’s not the only one. I’ve talked to several folks over the years, people outside the church like him, as well as every Sunday attenders, who finally admit that they’re not believers. They’ve heard the sermons, they’ve read the books, they’ve considered the arguments, they’ve been on the retreats. Nope. Nothing there.

I think there are more out there. Maybe they’re still actively trying to believe. Maybe they haven’t admitted to themselves – let alone to another – that they don’t believe. They keep thinking: If only I do this, then I’ll feel it, then I’ll believe. But they don’t. They’re stuck.

Part of that stuck (“stuckness” might sound better grammatically, but it sounds just plain bad) might be that they’re not really open to God. They say they are – they tell themselves and others that they are. But they’re not. It might be that God just hasn’t broken through to them yet.

I think believing in Jesus is a good thing – when understood biblically, the best thing. I want people who are stuck on the outside of belief to become unstuck. What can we do?

In the first place, I pray for my friends. I’m not just praying for sinners or lost folks. I’m praying for my friends. I believe my relationship with them matters.

Secondly, our churches need to admit the reality of this phenomenon. Instead we get stuck on numbers: Attendance, membership, offering, budgets. Or stuck on routine – doing what we’ve always done. Or stuck on keeping up appearances. We need to learn to tell the truth and become a place where people can safely tell the truth about themselves. I’m not assuming, however, that we have infallible insight into ourselves, or that telling the truth is simply or easy in any way. It’s hard. Some of the things we take to be the truth aren’t. When it comes to believing in Jesus this works two ways. Sometimes we say that, yes, we are followers of Jesus. But we’re fooling ourselves. We might think we’re telling the truth, but we’re not. Other times, we might say, No, we’ve tried to be believers, but we’re not. But that’s not quite right either. Jesus has more of us than we even know ourselves.

But assuming for a moment that at least some of the time we know the truth about ourselves. We need churches that allow people to openly identify themselves as seekers. None of the churchly or semi-churchly non-believers of the type I’m talking about are excited or proud of their lack of belief. They sound like they’d rather believe. What would happen if we allowed them to be open about their seeking? In such a setting perhaps others could come along side them – not with condemnation and lecturing, but with love and encouragement. I’m convinced that really healthy churches will have more than just believers showing up on Sundays.

A final thing we need is genuine work of God in our midst. Excellence is good, but we need more than excellent bulletins, sermons, studies, & music. We need more than clean restrooms, convenient parking and friendly people. We need God. We need the movement of God in our midst doing the unpredictable and the uncontrollable in our midst.

Sure, there will be rationality involved. God doesn’t desire us to leave our brains home or in sleep mode. But we need more than rationality (but surely njot less).

Sure, there will be emotion involved. God doesn’t desire that we somberly mourn the passing of our loved ones every Sunday. There’s joy that Jesus has defeated all the powers of sin, death and hell for us. The very stones would cry out if we didn’t. But we need more than emotion (though surely not less).

We need God. We need God’s work in the lives of individuals and families, work that is inexplicable by any other means. We need people to step into the story of God and then report what they see, hear and experience. We need God if anyone is going to truly come to faith. Then we might become unstuck and help other become unstuck – and stuck again with Jesus.

March 27, 2009

Evolution in Texas Classrooms

Filed under: Church & State,Evolution — rheyduck @ 1:08 am

The Texas Board of Education is again facing the issue of how to teach evolution in our schools. In an opinion piece in Tuesday’s Dallas Morning News Daniel W. Foster, M.D. argues in favor of teaching evolution. He closes his piece:

My views on this are informed by my faith. I am an elder in the First Presbyterian Church of Dallas where I have taught church school for more than 30 years. The teacher of the faith that I follow, confronted with the secular world of the Roman Empire, said “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God, the things that are God’s.” (Matthew 22:21)

To paraphrase, the teacher said, don’t mix up faith and the secular. The State Board of Education should heed that lesson.

Sounds to me like Dr. Foster is a disciple of John Locke. The church’s job is to deal with eternal life. The magistrate’s job is to deal with real life issues of this world.

The context of Jesus’ statement isn’t “the secular.” It’s paying taxes. “Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar,” his challengers asked him. They knew they had him this time. If he said, “Yes – Caesar is an authority we need to recognize and bow down to,” then the Jews would stop following him. If he said, “No – We Jews should reject the laws of that pagan,” they could call in the Roman authorities to have him arrested. Either way, they finally had trapped Jesus.

But Jesus eluded their trap with the words the doctor quoted. But the Christian tradition has, to a great extent, not been content to divide off a secular realm where faith – if we mean by that, discipleship to Jesus – has no say. Is the doctor suggesting Christians – people of “faith” – should have nothing to say about abortion? Capital punishment? Stem cell experimentation? Slavery? An equitable tax code? War crimes? After all, Caesar wants the say on all these things. Sure our current Caesar is happy for us to have opinions about these things, just as long as we either agree with him or stay in our closets praying.

Coming to the doctor’s particular subject, does teaching that everything came into being by purely natural and purely random forces, that there is no such thing as purpose or meaning in life – unless that purpose or meaning be completely autonomous – have no connection with any legitimate form of faith? Saying that science qua science has nothing to say about these things is one thing. Saying that followers have no legitimate reason to question such things is another.

March 21, 2009

Foolish Spending

Filed under: Current events,Economics — rheyduck @ 9:57 pm

I’ve heard a lot about foolish spending lately. Most recently it’s million dollar bonuses at AIG. Before that it was a lavish executive retreat. A few months back it was an office bathroom renovation.

Foolish spending is nothing new. A few years ago I heard of a major corporation paying $210 million dollars to a CEO (who is now running Chrysler) to make him resign. Sounds pretty foolish to me.

But who’s to decide what counts as foolish? We’re going through a time when government is taking over large swaths of the business world and legislating definitions of foolishness. “Excessive” pay is now deemed foolish, and the tax code is being re-written to punish the recipients of foolish largess. They don’t seem to understand that if congress has to approve of economic activity to make it legitimate, there will be much less economic activity.

I think yachts are excessive. I’ve never had a yacht and never thought I needed one. Years ago when the luxury tax was increased to hit yachts, it didn’t bother me. I wasn’t one of those rich guys out to buy a yacht. It’s also a good thing I wasn’t one of the not-so-rich guys who built or maintained yachts. If so, when the rich guys stopped buying yachts (that’s the message they got from the increased taxation), the yacht builders took the hit. Didn’t hurt the rich guys. They were still rich.

I’m sure some people think my industry is foolish. Can you imagine giving ten percent of your income to something as foolish as a church?  If people stopped giving to churches just think what they could afford: new cars, second homes, nicer vacations. But then some of us would be out of a job.

I’m not a big spender. I never have been. Family members tell me it’s genetic.  If everyone was like me we’d have a much smaller economy. Do our political leaders want everyone to be like me? Or do they want people to spend freely (like they used to) so the economy will recover? Will they promulgate a list of acceptable things to spend money on?

Maybe the government is hoping to do all the spending itself. Their wisdom is surely greater than that of the ordinary human. They know how to save money, too. Some are really creative. I’d rather see them get out of the way of us ordinary fools at the bottom of the food chain.

March 19, 2009

My daughter is annoyed

Filed under: AIG,Current events,Economics,Politics — rheyduck @ 3:50 pm

I took my youngest child on a spring break trip to Washington. While there, the AIG bonus news was breaking (and breaking, and breaking) on every news outlet. She told me she was annoyed – more by the constant coverage than by the bonuses.

My thoughts on the mess are mixed.

First, why is everyone acting surprised that people want more money?Huge bonuses, some in the multi-million dollar range, sound attractive to me. They obviously sound attractive to people in congress who continually vote themselves raises and, when out of office, become lobbyists paid millions to get their former colleagues to do favors for their employers. I am not shocked that there is the appearance of greed on Wall Street. I am shocked that more people don’t see it elsewhere.

Second, I am unimpressed with the elite, with the “best and the brightest.” We fill our major financial institutions with the  “best and the brightest.” We put them in congress and the White House. We make them CEOs. Too many are overly impressed with themselves and too interested in forwarding their own interests. Sure, they’re smarter than the rest of us and so know what is best for us, but even then their execution isn’t what I’d expect.

Third, I have inadequate information on the mechanism of the AIG bonuses. What is it people are being rewarded for? Having a pulse? Working for AIG? Making money for the company? Only losing 2 billion instead of 3? The issue of retention has been mentioned. Are we trying to keep the guys who killed AIG corralled in one spot lest they inflict similar damage elsewhere? Or are they the realy good guys who might jump ship to go to a more successful company?

Fourth, do people who work for these companies have a social conscience? Sure, they probably vote for the correct political party and give token amounts to the correct charities, but is Mammon the chief of their pantheon? Do they ever think, “I could do this and make piles of money for myself and my company, but it’d destroy the lives of some and impoverish others, so I’m not going to do it – even though it is completely legal.”

Finally, is anyone in power willing to tell the truth – about their own actions, not just those sinful other guys? I precious few in either the business or political class willing to tell the truth. Instead, they’re prancing around defending their own righteousness and wisdom. I guess that at least those who like to see bipartisanship can rejoice that both parties are failing at the same time.

March 12, 2009

Tired

Filed under: Barack Obama,Current events,Economics,Prayer — rheyduck @ 9:00 pm

I’m tired.

I believe that what we call the economy is (at least largely) a human institution. The markets and regional components of the economy are driven by human actions. Human actions are sometimes driven by the thoughts and feelings of the person acting. When I talk the economy up, a couple people might come to think the economy is looking up. When the President, Speaker of the House, Rush Limbaugh, talk the economy up, many more people might come to think the economy is looking up. If the economy being up is taken as a good thing, i.e, manifested in people having basic job security with the possibility of wages to support their families, then I’d think talking the economy up to be a good thing.

I’m tired of people talking the economy down. Yes, yes, I know the “facts.” I know that by many current measures it is down.  But why do I have to go by these measures? Why must I take description as the only valid illocutionary act? All the reported measures are selected from many more that could have been selected. None of the measures (unless they’re meta-measures, that is, measures of measures) are perfectly current. All reflect human action driven to a great extent by thought and action. Therefore reporting on the measures feeds back into the system and affects the measures. We bring up just any thing by talking about it. I’m not a prosperity gospeller. But our attitude does have an impact on systems for good or ill.

Our president is a human. As the one currently at the top of the heap, the influence of his words and actions is tremendous. As a human being he can be talked up or talked down. I’m tired of people talking him down. (But then I was tired of people talking Bush – and Clinton – down in their time.) Whether I agree with his policies, decisions and actions is irrelevant. I believe he will be better off if I talk him up than if I talk him down.

I have not yet lived under a president who – in my estimation – was right about everything, even everything I think is important.  But so what? Even if I’m right about everything (doubtful), my calling as a follower of Jesus is to edify people. “Edify” means “build up.”Jesus says, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” With the examples he uses one could add another phrase, “Even if he/she is wrong.”

I even wish Mr. bin Laden of Al Qaeda well. My wishing him well, however, is on my own terms. He is not my lord and master. When I wish him well, I express a desire that he would turn from sin to Jesus. I pray for him to learn of the truth and grace manifested in Jesus, so that he might become a follower of Jesus. Admittedly, Mr. bin Laden might not wish me to wish him well on those terms. That doesn’t matter any more than the intentions of the executioners mattered to the one who said, “Father forgive them they know not what they do.”

I understand what those who express a wish that our president fail are trying to say. I don’t have any evidence that they’re followers of Jesus, so I’m not terribly surprised.  Wishing your enemies well – even if they’re only ideological enemies – is profoundly unnatural. For me, it takes Jesus in my life.

But speaking simply on a practical level, I think wishing the failure of political opponents (instead of clearly and only aiming at policies or ideas or practices) is not good for anyone. I always want the president of my country to succeed. My wanting doesn’t do much good (who am I, after all). But I pray. When I pray for people to succeed (I confess I rarely use such a vague term in my prayers) I pray for their success on God’s terms. As when I pray rightly for my own success, I recognize that my personal standards of success and of what counts as success are not what ultimately counts. Judgment day will not be a self-grading exam. God’s word is what counts.

In this light, I believe that talking people down – especially people at the top – beyond being disrespectful, is counter-productive. It hurts me and innocent bystanders as much as hit hurts my target. Most assuredly it guarantees that the person I’m talking down will never listen to me. And I want people to listen to me. While I don’t want to talk people down, I do  think it is good to argue with them. Can you imagine that – Arguing in love! I take that as a variant of “Speak the truth in love.”

So let me put it plain and simple: In the same way that talking the economy up is better for the economy and those impacted (“enmeshed” might be a better word), talking the president up is better for him and for those who live under his leadership.

March 9, 2009

Figuring out Islam

Filed under: Islam — rheyduck @ 10:34 pm

One way to understand the nature of a thing is to consult an encyclopedia, dictionary or textbook. Another way is to investigate it in the wild. Usually the latter shows the former to tend toward the simplistic. Since parameters are limited – just so many words or pages – authors have to limit their scope and selectivity. Investigation of phenomena in the wild tends to be messy and ad hoc, since reality doesn’t come with the neat demarcations we see in books.

Figuring out Islam has been important here in the US for almost a decade now. Sure, there was plenty of curiosity before that, but with the events culminating in and leading from 9/11, Americans have been forced to investigate Islam. We hear that it’s a “religion of peace.” We hear that it’s a movement of barbarians trying to move us back to the 7th century. Or we sit down with our textbooks and learn about “five pillars,” the life of Muhammed, the diversity in the current Islamic world, and the differences between Sunni, Shia, Sufi, Alawite, etc.

Turning toward my own life, I find that textbooks on Christianity sometimes paint a picture of the faith not in accord with my own beliefs and practices. Once I see that the truncated definition of Christianity differs from what I see in practice, I wonder if the truncated version of Islam (and other “religions”) found in textbooks is as helpful as I’d been led to believe.

Here’s a story out of Saudi Arabia.  A couple of young guys help an elderly widow. The whole lot of them are arrested, sentenced to prison and lashings for breaking the rules of gender segregation. I see two key behaviors here. First, there is the care shown for a widow. Second, there is the punishment for mingling. Is either of these a pointer toward the nature of Islam? Might we understand these two young guys who show compassion to an elderly widow – who (troublingly for themselves in the light of the rules) was unrelated – as an instance of the ethos of Islam? If so, we could take Islam as teaching care for the unfortunate.

Or might we take the prosecution for mingling as a pointer toward the nature of Islam? Should we infer that it’s ok to let widows starve, according to Islam, as long as we remain completely pure? While they could both – or neither – be pointers in that direction, the combination of the two strikes my American sensibilities as an odd combination. The Muslims I have known came down more on the side of compassion than on the side of prosecution. I’d like to think that the action of the two helpful young men shows the true nature of Islam and that the action of the Saudi religious police is simply Saudi tribalism and misogyny at work.

The thing is, however, it’s not for me to say which – if either – is the true face of Islam. It;s not my “game.” I have no authority. While I have to choose my actions in accord with my expectations of what people will do, I am not in a place to define Islam for Muslims. But they are. When I claim to represent Jesus, I have to watch myself. I don’t want to do anything that would either cause people to think less of him or serve as a barrier to people coming to faith in him. With that commitment added to my role as a pastor and scholar, I am part of an ongoing argument (smile!) about the nature of this enterprise we call Christianity. In the same way, Muslims, as participants in the Muslim tradition, are engaged in a similar ongoing argument. Who will win? The question of “winning” over simplifies things and tends to assume an outsider’s point of view. As an outsider to the Islamic tradition, I would say that they have some work to do if they – as a tradition, not merely as individuals or as groups within – want to live with peace and respect toward people of other traditions. What will they do with it? Time will tell.

A Balanced Life?

Filed under: Discipline,Spirituality — rheyduck @ 3:33 pm

A balanced life is something we think a good thing. But what do we mean by “balance?” If you listen to the Catalyst podcast you may have heard Erwin McManus talk about balance (I don’t remember if it was episode 52 or episode 24. Both are worth listening to). As long as balance means something like a little of this, a little of that, nothing to the extreme, he wasn’t a fan. He wants to be all out for Jesus.

John Stackhouse, in Making the Best of It sums up after talking about the importance and fruitfulness of interruptions in our life (Illustrated in the life of Phillip in Acts 8):

“In sum, we can retain the ideal of a balanced life, but now in a way radically qualified by our understanding of mission and vocation. Balance in this case is not the balance of a dancer raised on one foot, or even of a spinning top. It is much more dynamic: the balance of a runner traversing a broken-up and heaving landscape. To maintain the balance for this step and to prepare well for the next step. the runner might well have to lean way off center – to be deliberately off-balance in terms of a snapshot, but properly balanced in terms of a journey. This metaphor thus rules out both the idea of a detailed template in which every Christian life ought to be lived and also utter confusion in no option, no matter how extreme, can be judged as wrong. The proof is in the success of the journey. Missteps of either sort – trying to maintain a static, universal ideal or indulging in capricious impulse – will result in a fall. The question is, does the runner keep going toward the goal?”

March 5, 2009

Discipleship Goals #5

Filed under: Evangelism,Five Practices,Ministry,Salvation — rheyduck @ 9:56 pm

Evangelism, the apparent traditional equivalent of what we now call “Radical Hospitality” closes out this series on the characteristics we try to build into the lives of disciples in our work of disciple making. This equation may be my least favorite item in our current lingo. It blurs the distinction between two important aspects of our life together as Christians. This blurring may not be so serious since “evangelism” itself has become blurred over the past century or so. Because of these blurrings and the resulting confusion (and conflict), I’d prefer to talk here about our work of helping people who are not followers of Jesus become followers of Jesus.

In ideal circumstances (sticking to the bible), becoming a follower of Jesus would happen at roughly the same time as becoming a part of the institution known as church. We lack those ideal circumstances today. Talking about “Radical Hospitality” seems to lend itself to the latter (becoming a part of the church) more than to the former (becoming a follower of Jesus). While having greeters,  clean restrooms, plenty of parking, a tidy nursery, and plenty of signage are signs of hospitality and can be conducive to people sticking around long enough to hear the gospel and become followers of Jesus, they have no necessary connection to this goal. In other words, if all we have is a friendly, well directed, clean church (maybe even with coffee and donuts), we can fail to win a single person to Christ.

In another area of blurring, we can engage in “social action” all day long, every day of the year, and never win a single person to Christ. Jesus clearly calls us to live out his Kingdom reality. He clearly calls us to give food to the hungry and drink to the thirsty, to visit the infirm and imprisoned, and to heal the sick. But if we never call people to repentance and faith in Jesus, we’re missing something essential.

We aim to produce disciples who through their daily living demonstrate the reality and goodness of God in such a way that  people will ask questions. These disciples when then boldly open their mouths and tell of Jesus and how to put faith in him.

  1. Disciples share a conviction that they have a central role in evangelism. Since many of us in the mainline church are mortally afraid to speak to others – unless the subject is anything but Jesus – we really wish God would just do the work without us. God almost never does the work without us. People will not come to faith in Jesus unless we obey God and go to them.
  2. Disciples have a passion to reach those who don’t know Jesus. Some of the people we connect with Jesus will be our friends and relatives. Others will begin as total strangers. Jesus’ passionate love for us brought him into the world – a world that usually wanted nothing to do with him, a world that, in the end, killed him. As followers of Jesus, we have that same passionate love for people. We’re not content to see them missing out on the life Jesus offers. While there are arguments for universalism – the notion that all will be saved regardless of their desire to be saved, their faith (or lack thereof), or anything else – we realize that when we act as if universalism is true we are not betting our lives (we’re already followers of Jesus, after all) but the lives of others. Universalism could be wrong.
  3. Disciples understand evangelism as the work of the church, not merely (or even primarily) of individuals. When we think of helping others become followers of Jesus we think of people like Billy Graham. We know we’re not Billy Graham. We then dismiss the possibility that we might have a role in the process. We aim to make disciples who recognize not only their essential role in the process, but also that no one can do the work alone. Because people are different and have different life stories, they will come to faith in different contexts. We need the whole body working together, demonstrating the grace and mercy of Jesus together, so that people might believe.
  4. Disciples want there to be ample opportunity for pre-Christians to see for themselves the power of Christ in our lives: transformed lives, healings (physical, mental, emotional, spiritual), quality of relationships, etc., so that when they hear the Gospel they can understand it in terms of what they’ve seen. Words are essential for people coming to faith in Christ. Words alone, however, are almost never enough. As we let God live in us and through us (individually and corporately), people see for themselves what God is like and what God has done. Our words are merely the captions for those pictures.
  5. Disciples want the church to be aware of the needs of the community God has set us in, and have a desire to glorify God by meeting those needs.  Christianity gets part of the credit/blame for what we call modern individualism. Jesus calls us each to respond individually to him. But all of us are embedded in some community, usually a set of overlapping and interlocking communities. As messengers of the Good News, we seek to demonstrate God’s reality not only to individuals but to our communities: to families, neighborhoods, cities, towns, tribes and nations. One way we do that is by allowing God to meet their needs through us.

Discipleship Goals #5

Filed under: Five Practices,Local church,Ministry — rheyduck @ 9:22 pm

Our conference talks about Risk Taking Ministry. As a pastor I’d be happy if all my people were involved in any kind of ministry. In my life the genre of literature that has most spurred me to risk taking ministry is missionary biography. When I compare their lives of faith with my own I see two things. First, I give thanks that my life is so easy and comfortable. Second, I see that I’ve risked hardly anything.

Why bother taking a risk? Why bother trying something that might fail? When I read the bible I see that God habitually calls people to do things they can’t do by themselves. If God doesn’t come through, they’re sunk. And here we are engineering our lives so that we don’t need God – so that we have all the resources we need to get by without any help at all. In the process of living independently, we miss God. Our faith stays weak, just as muscles that never encounter resistance stay weak. We want strong disciples, thus we see being in ministry not as a characteristic of a certain class of Christian (like the ordained), but of all who are disciples.

  1. Disciples are in ministry. Jesus said, “As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.” “The Son of Man came not to be served but to serve.” As followers of Jesus, we do what he did.
  2. Disciples understand they are part of what God is doing in the world and that their obedience will make an eternal difference in the lives of others. Our culture says, “If you want it done right, do it yourself.” God doesn’t think that way. God invites us to join in the Kingdom work. It isn’t make-work or hoop jumping. The work God calls us to make a real and lasting difference in the lives of people. If I were a Calvinist, I’d take comfort in the belief that my lack of obedience would never prevent God’s will from being done for another person. I’m not a Calvinist (at least not in that aspect). Real loss is possible – for me and the people around me – when I fail to respond to God’s call.
  3. Disciples know what their spiritual gifts are and use them with joy and faithfulness. God equips us for ministry. While our “natural” talents are put at God’s disposal also, the Holy Spirit gives us abilities we never would have had apart from divine intervention. Some of these gifts make us look good. Some will never be known by another person. Either way we take joy in joining God.
  4. Disciples work together as teams in ministry. Most of the ministry God calls us to cannot be done or sustained by our efforts alone. God arranges gifted people in the Body just as the organs of the human body are arranged in each individual. We need each other.
  5. Disciples respond to the guidance of the Holy Spirit in the execution of their ministries and in the development of new ministries. We need not only the Spirit’s equipping but also the Spirit’s guidance in our ministry. We need the Spirit to sharpen and aid our perceptual and interpretive faculties. Sometimes the ministry to which God calls us will make good sense to just about everyone. Sometimes we won’t have a clue what’s happening: We’ll simply be obeying.
  6. Disciples with more experience seek out new people to train in ministry. The normal way to pick up new skills or to develop facility with new abilities is to watch those more gifted than ourselves. Ministry is multiplied as we draw in people who are less experienced than we are and help them join in. Jesus’ model of discipleship is a form of apprenticeship. As his disciples, we are each apprentices of those who are farther along than we are, and take apprentices who aren’t as far along as we are.
  7. Disciples have the ability and confidence to respond to new needs and situations as they arise.  As we follow Jesus, taking up his agenda for our lives, we employ our creativity and innovation. We know the world is changing and that the people we need to reach today are likely culturally different from the people we used to reach. Followers of Jesus are willing to do new things to connect new generations and populations with Jesus.
  8. All ministry leads to demonstrating the love of God so that people might know Him and become faithful disciples. We can get tired just thinking of all the things that need to be done. The end we pursue, however, isn’t mere busyness or task completion. We do what we do so that God’s love might be manifest through us so that people might become disciples also.

March 4, 2009

Discipleship Goals #4

Filed under: Five Practices,Spirituality,Stewardship — rheyduck @ 2:46 pm

Stewardship seems like a word for old timers. Now we have Extravagant Generosity. The subject is the same: God has put resources at our disposal and holds us accountable for their use. When our lives are dominated by fear – fear of survival, fear of being able to keep up with our competitors – we hold on to our resources as if they give us life. When we walk by faith in Jesus, we find our life in Jesus and are able to hold things loosely.

Here are some characteristics that describe the life of one following Jesus with regard to resources:

  1. Disciples are able to trust God to take care of them and provide for their needs. If it is primarily up to us to see that our needs are met then worry and fear and the consequent hoarding of resources make sense. But if God can – and will – take care of us, we can hold on to things loosely. Many years ago I was meeting with a church nominations committee. We were trying to find people to serve on the Finance committee the following year. I asked them, “What’s the first thing we want in someone on Finance?” They agreed. “We want someone who is tight.” That was a tight church. As pastor I had to have Board approval to buy stamps. The sad part was that their tightness – expressed in finances and multiple other ways – drove off the younger generations (including their own children and grandchildren). I’d rather have someone who trusted God in the area of money than someone who is tight.
  2. Disciples understand themselves as stewards of their possessions. It makes sense to talk about my possessions. But I’ll miss God if I think that all my stuff is my stuff. All I have is a gift from God. As a steward, I am entrusted with the use and disposal of various resources. I am accountable to God for how I use them.
  3. Disciples see tithing as a starting point for giving. The OT talks more about tithing than the NT. Jesus’ comment on tithing references the Pharisee’s fixation on tithing to the exclusion of more important things. By my reading, the NT standard isn’t 10% – it’s 100%. 100% of what I have belongs to God and is his to command. As far as giving to the church, though, I have found 10% to be a good start.
  4. Disciples are generous in meeting the needs of others. When I preach on giving I tell my people that if all they do is give to the church, they’re likely missing God. We’re surrounded by so many people in need. While it’s easy to defer responsibility for them to the government, God doesn’t think that releases us from our obligation to love people in a practical way in their hour of need. It’s unlikely we’ll be able to fully meet every need. But we can meet some of many needs.
  5. That the gift of hospitality will be shown in such a way that Disciples will open their homes for various groups – both Christian and seeker – to meet in.  Christian stewardship is about more than money. As we welcome people into our homes, we put our homes – for most of us, our largest investments – at God’s disposal.
  6. Disciples live a life of sacrifice – following in the footsteps of Jesus. Following the suggestion of Guy Williams, I thought I should add this. We think our sacrifice is having to get up early on Sunday morning – of giving anything at all. A life of sacrifice (in this area) will entail what Wesley calls “saving all we can.”He didn’t mean socking money away in the bank. He was talking about doing without. Disciples obey God in the use of resources will often not have the newest cars, the fanciest homes, the most extravagant vacations. We’ll do without.
Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress